This week I had the chance to spend
some time Bill Baquet, owner of the company I work for, CSI Fullmer. Bill is a
36 year veteran of the contract furniture industry having started as a salesman
when he was only 28. In that time he has started and or purchased half a dozen
companies. This, he says, will be his last. I took the opportunity to ask him
about the tools he has used over the years to motivate employees of all sorts.
To begin, I briefly explained the
concepts of intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000). He
needed no explanation and immediately proceeded to give me examples of how he
measures his employees’ desires. In my case he pointed out he knew that because
I had voluntarily pursued a position selling financial products that he could
begin training me for an account management position. He saw on my resume a
varied skill set that he could take advantage of for the benefit of the company
but that at the same time he could challenge with new responsibilities.
I’ve been with the company now
seven years and in that time two other team members have been promoted to
account management, one other designer from my department and a former customer
service representative. I asked Bill why he would promote account managers, who
are paid a base plus commission, versus simply hiring outside sales people, who
are commission only. He answered that, besides affording both the company and
the employees a way of increasing their income, the company can retain
personnel who are seeking to move up instead of losing them and the training
already invested in them. In addition, the newly promoted account managers have
a transition period in which they train their replacements while training for
sales skills themselves. Note that in our company training is on the job, there
are no formal training programs in place.
Having learned the above I asked
Bill about how he maintains a level reward system, being that not every
employee gets a chance to promote to account manager. We talked a little bit
about Martin and Schmidt’s (2010) notion that employees who feel aren’t getting
an equitable part of the rewards may balk. Bill quickly pointed out that people
are aware, and respect the fact, that bonuses are a perk the company offers
voluntarily. Bill related that bonuses are effective as a reward for employees
when they work hard, doing their job, to keep the company moving forward profitably.
There is no expectation that employees go above and beyond fulfilling their job
descriptions, for which a different reward system, like equal profit sharing,
would probably be better. This made sense to me; I have noticed that my
coworkers are always happy, and genuinely appreciative of the semi-annual
bonuses the owners have given out almost without fail in my seven years working
for them.
Lastly, we talked about how the
company keeps employees engaged in the daily operations of the business. In the
course of a day, small company as we are and as busy as we get, it’s not
unusual for staff to get into a rhythm of simply trying to keep up with the
workload, let alone have time to engage in thoughtful execution of tasks with a
mind towards process improvement. We do have weekly staff meetings that are
informational with regards to the operations and business opportunities on
hand, but they stop short of consistently sharing pertinent financial
information. I shared with Bill that some companies have found that “an
open-book” management philosophy helps engage employees (Heymann & Barrera,
2010), and asked if this something he’d ever considered. To this he had a very
simple and short response, that that information is on a “need to know basis”.
He explained that the small size of our industry requires a higher level of
discretion with such competitive information. Again, this is an understandable
position, I have been in this industry 12 years myself, and it is no
exaggeration that everybody knows everybody.
It was a very enlightening
conversation with Bill about how he runs a small business. The reading this
week offered some great concepts about employee engagement, remuneration, and
motivation. In talking with Bill though, the practical applications of these
became acutely clear. These are all good concepts but, like so many others,
have to be considered on a case by case basis.
References
Heymann, J., Barrera, M. (2010) Engaging
Employees in the Company's Profits and Their Own, Harvard Business
School , pp.
1-28
Ryan, R., and Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic
Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational
Psychology. No. 25, pp. 54-67
Felipe, you make a great point that reward systems must be considered on a case by case basis. What works for one company is not necessarily a good fit for another. Bill says that he has not considered open book management, and that information is on a "need to know" basis." Do you agree with his choice? You say that "everybody knows everything" in your industry. Do you think that the risks of implementing open book management would outweigh the benefits?
ReplyDeleteHi Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI'm inclined to agree with Bill in this case. Our industry is a very small industry, most of us employed in it are a captive talent pool, if you will, in that we've all worked for competing firms over the years. In my case, this is the second time I work for Bill. I can understand why Bill would be wary of sharing information that could give competitors an advantage if they were to somehow get hold of it.
What Bill does do is give enough information about the progress of the company that people feel charged with contributing to its success. He does this by accounting for how each department, and individual, has helped or hindered the company's progress in the weekly staff meeting. When someone does something well, the praise is public and immediate. He might share that a sales person closed a half million dollar sale, or that a project manager completed a job under budget and with an overall margin of xx. When something goes wrong, the issue is approached so that the individual isn't chastised but so that the company can learn from the situation. Along with this he might share what the net loss on the project was.
In effect, the degree of open book management can be measured such that benefits can be derived without giving up the actual quarterly or annual financial results.